evidence

0% of vulnerabilities cause
0% of the financial loss

We'll bet $5 million
we found the ones that do.

Only a small, constantly changing set of vulnerabilities drives financial loss. Evidence maps your footprint, spotlights financial risk, and warranties your organization.

Leadership

Security leadership.

Jeremiah Grossman

Chief Executive Officer

Robert Hansen

Chief Technology Officer

0

Combined years in cyber security

0

Cyber security startups founded

0

Combined years in vulnerability mgmt

Pioneered

Multiple cyber security industries

CISOs

Highly connected in their community

0

Cyber security connections

0

F500 connections

0

Social media followers

Insurance

Connected with leading carriers

0

Author credits

0

Cyber security patents

Secured

World's largest companies

The problem space

We can't solve everything. But we solve what matters most.

Not every breach can be addressed by external attack surface management. But the fastest-growing vector, externally exploitable vulnerabilities, can.

Vuln exploitation20%

Credentials22%

Phishing16%

Error / misconfig15%

Social eng.13%

Insider / other14%

0

YoY increase in vuln exploitation

0

Increase in edge / VPN device exploits

0

Gap: exploit (<5d) vs. remediate (60d)

Initial access vectors in confirmed breaches. 58% of ransomware claims start with a compromised VPN/firewall. Sources: Verizon 2025 DBIR, Akamai State of the Internet 2025, CISA KEV, Mandiant M-Trends 2025, Coalition Cyber Threat Index 2025.

The severity spectrum

Most CVEs aren't critical. Almost none get exploited.

Even after filtering to Critical severity, only about 0.46% of CVEs are actively exploited in the wild (CISA KEV).

All CVEs published0100%

Low severity +0~94%

Medium severity +0~90%

High severity +0~45%

Critical0~12%

Source: cvedata.com / NVD.

The broken stack

A stack that cannot solve itself.

01

EASM

Partial discovery

Companies see only a fraction of their externally-facing assets. The rest are blind spots.

02

VM scanners

The vulnerability race

Scanners compete on volume. More CVEs found = more perceived value, regardless of relevance.

03

Pricing

Prohibitive coverage model

Per-asset cost makes full coverage prohibitive. You scan what you can afford, not what matters.

04

Prioritization

Magic math, hidden

Proprietary scoring behind a curtain. No transparency, no audit trail. Just trust us.

05AI accelerantThe race just got 100x faster.

The industry disconnect

We focus on the 0.2%.

Evidence gives security teams a defensible clean slate, not a theoretical-risk backlog.

Everything vulnerableTheoretical risk

Known exploited (KEVs)0%

FIREs0%

FIRE: actuarially proven, tied to real-world loss. ICE: incident-causing exposures.

How it works

EASM. VM. Disclosure.

Three steps, daily. The way it should always have worked.

01

Discover

Complete EASM coverage

Map your complete external attack surface automatically. No agents. Every asset, every day.

Continuous coverage

02

Correlate

VM + actuarial data

Daily VM scans across your full surface, cross-referenced with actuarial insurance claims and DFIR incident data.

Insurance + DFIR + VM

03

Disclose

FIRE & ICE findings

Transparent disclosure of vulnerabilities tied to financial loss (FIRE) and active breaches (ICE).

FIRE + ICE output

The new standard

The road to zero.

Zero is not aspirational. It is the only acceptable number.

TodayMillions of open findings

With EvidenceNo open FIRE findings. Always.

0

The expectation: get you to zero. Keep you at zero. Always.

A different approach

Other vendors want to find more. We want you to have no financial loss.

Other vendors

× Measure risk by activity
× Prioritize on subjective severity
× More vulns is better
× No accountability

Evidence

✓ Focuses on the vulns that cause loss
✓ Powered by actuarial cyber-insurance + DFIR data
✓ Measures financial risk reduction
✓ Backed by warranty protection

Warranty protection

If we miss it, we cover it.

Warranty protection up to $0

If a breach results in financial loss from a remotely exploitable vulnerability we did not report to you, we cover that loss. No other vulnerability management vendor offers this, because none of them ground their findings in actuarial data.

Your guarantee

Either way, you're covered.

Scenario A

You're already protected.

Someone else gets breached first. We've already mapped it from actuarial data, so you were notified and inoculated before it ever reached you.

Scenario B

We pay
$0.

You get breached on a vuln we didn't disclose - you'd be the first organization in history. Your financial downside is protected.

The bottom line

The same evidence insurers use. Now in your hands.

0%

of CVEs that cause financial loss

0%

of internet-facing assets scanned

up to

<$5M

warranty protection

0% of vulnerabilities cause0% of the financial loss